Back to the PPSG
Homepage
Back to the PPSG
Bibliography

"Notice: this article appears on the PPSG website with the express permission of the copyright holder, who should be consulted for further permission to reproduce."
1994 Joranson DE. Global opioid consumption: trends, barriers, and diversion. IASP Newsletter 1994 September/October:4-5.

Global Opioid Consumption: Trends, Barriers, and Diversion

David E. Joranson, MSSW

Pain Research Group, University of Wisconsin Medical School, and World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care, Madison, Wisconsin, USA



Programs to improve cancer pain relief are growing worldwide. Strong opioid analgesics such as morphine must be available to caregivers who manage severe cancer pain (WHO, 1986). In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) uses morphine consumption as one indicator of progress to improve cancer pain relief (WHO, 1990). Although the commercial availability of opioid analgesics in the United States is generally sufficient for medical needs, this is not true for the majority of the world's population. This article summarizes recent trends in global opioid consumption and suggests a method for assessing barriers to opioid availability, with a discussion of the risk of opioid diversion (Joranson, 1993).

In nearly half of the countries in the world, there is little or no use of morphine. Almost all of the morphine that is produced for medical purposes is consumed in developed countries. Although these countries also use other opioid analgesics, consumption of morphine continues to be used as an indicator, because morphine is widely accepted and used throughout the world and because reasonably good data are available.

Global morphine use, low and stable for many years, finally began to increase in 1984 with the inception of the WHO cancer pain relief program. By 1991 (the most recent year for which statistics are available), global consumption of morphine had increased by 272% over 1984 consumption. As of 1991, the 10 countries with the highest consumption of morphine used 57% of the world supply (in alphabetical order): Australia, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The top 20 consumer countries, all of which are developed countries, consumed 86% of the morphine in the world. The remaining amount was consumed by countries that have the majority of the world's population.

The United Nations health and narcotic control agencies have recognized that insufficient use of opioid analgesics is traceable to several barriers, including restrictive laws and regulations that interfere with opioid production and distribution. According to the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB): "Prevention of availability of opiates for medical use does not necessarily guarantee prevention of the abuse of illicitly procured opiates. Overly restrictive approaches may, in the end, merely result in depriving a majority of the population access to opiate medications" (United Nations, 1989a).

Health professionals should understand how the international and national drug regulatory systems work so they can effectively identify and address barriers to opioid availability. Many professionals may not know, for example, that their country's narcotic control laws are supposed to ensure the availability of opioids for medical needs. The WHO Expert Committee on Cancer Pain Relief and Active Supportive Care recently released a Guide to Opioid Availability to educate health professionals who want to improve opioid availability in their countries (WHO, 1993). The guide explains regulatory systems that can make opioids available - or unavailable - and encourages cooperative efforts with national drug regulators.

For example, the Expert Committee comments on special multiple copy prescription programs used by some governments: "The extent to which these programmes restrict or inhibit the prescribing of opioids to patients who need them should be questioned.... Health care workers may be reluctant to prescribe, stock, or dispense opioids if they feel that there is a possibility of their professional licenses being suspended or revoked by the governing authority in cases where large quantities of opioids are provided to an individual even though the medical need for such drugs can be proved" (WHO, 1990).

The 20-page guide also explains how the "national estimate" of medical need for opioids is established and how it can be changed. General recommendations are made for the regulation - not over-regulation - of health professionals who prescribe, dispense, and administer opioids. The guide is now available in Spanish, due to the efforts of health professionals in Colombia and the Colombian Ministry of Health.

Professionals who understand both cancer pain problems and the drug regulatory system are better prepared to take actions to address barriers to opioid availability. A systematic process should be used, beginning with the identification of the barriers in a particular country or province. A brief questionnaire is available to help health professionals identify barriers at different points in the drug distribution system and to assess the relative importance of each (Joranson, 1993).

After barriers to availability are identified, an action plan should be developed to remove them. The appropriate individuals or organizations should contact government agencies, policy makers, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and other private industries to begin a dialogue that leads to mutual understanding and change. The goal is to achieve a positive regulatory climate that clearly recognizes the rational use of opioid analgesics to manage cancer pain.

Drug abuse is a reality throughout the world. Regulators and health professionals must share the responsibility for preventing diversion of opioids to illegal uses. All professionals who use controlled drugs should follow reasonable procedures to prevent diversion. The INCB has determined that controls over opioid distribution in the world are working well and the diversion of morphine is small compared to the large volume distributed (United Nations, 1989b). In the United States, although morphine use has increased significantly, diversion of controlled substances (including opioids) has been decreasing.

The educational and policy work of the Wisconsin Cancer Pain Initiative (WCPI) and the Pain Research Group at the University of Wisconsin have focused unprecedented attention on the rational use of opioid analgesics throughout the state. From 1986 to 1990, morphine consumption in Wisconsin increased by 160% (from 421 to 1093 kg), exceeding the national average by 21% in 1990. The number of cases in which prescription morphine was seized by police was less than 10 per year during this five-year period. Compared with the several hundred cases of serious amphetamine diversion per year in the 1970s, the frequency with which morphine and other opioid analgesics has appeared in recent police reports is very low (Joranson, 1993).

The use of opioid analgesics can increase significantly without increases in opioid diversion and abuse, if reasonable controls are exercised during drug distribution. If diversion occurs, the answer is to stop those responsible for diversion, not to limit the necessary medical supply or distribution of opioids to patients.

References

Joranson, DE. Availability of opioids for cancer pain: recent trends, assessment of system barriers, new World Health Organization guidelines, and the risk of diversion, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 8 353-360. (1993)

United Nations. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1989: Demand for and Supply of Opiates for Medical and Scientific Needs. United Nations, Vienna, 1989a.

United Nations. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1989. United Nations, Vienna, 1989b.

World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1986.

World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care, Report of a WHO Expert Committee, World Health Organization. Geneva, 1986.

World Health Organization Cancer and Palliative Care Unit. Cancer Pain Relief- A Guide to Opioid Availability. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1986.