Back to the PPSG
Homepage
Back to the PPSG
Bibliography

"Notice: this article appears on the PPSG website with the express permission of the copyright holder, who should be consulted for further permission to reproduce."
1997 Joranson DE, Gilson AM. U.N. Agency: Global Action Needed to Improve Opioid Availability. APS Bulletin. 7(2): 10-11.

U.N. Agency: Global Action Needed to Improve Opioid Availability

David E. Joranson, MSSW; Aaron M. Gilson, MS MSSW

Editor's note: For the November/December 1995 issue of APS Bulletin, Robert T. Angarola and I wrote "International Efforts Under Way to Provide Adequate Medication for Pain Control" (Angarola & Joranson, 1995). This article reports the results of the international survey of governments conducted by the International Narcotics Control Board in 1995 and presents the board's recommendations for action to correct inadequate availability of opioids for medical uses.


The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has published a survey of national governments on the worldwide availability of opioid analgesics for the relief of pain in cancer, AIDS, and other conditions (INCB, 1995). INCB is an agency within the United Nations International Drug Control Program, headquartered in Vienna. INCB has the responsibility to monitor national implementation of the principal narcotic control treaties, the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (United Nations, 1977a) and the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances (United Nations, 1977b).

The Single Convention specifically recognizes the need to ensure medical availability of opioids, as well as to prevent their diversion and abuse. INCB invited the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) to comment on the report. In response, IASP surveyed its national chapters, including the American Pain Society (APS). INCB's report summarizes the responses from IASP national chapters. Several of the board's recommendations for action are directed not only to national governments, but also to health professionals and IASP.

Overview of survey results

Of the 209 governments surveyed, 65 (31%) responded; these governments represent 50% of the world's population. Less than half (48%) of this sample of national governments reported that morphine - in any dosage form - was stocked in all hospitals with cancer programs. Thirty-six governments (55% of the sample) indicated they had examined their healthcare systems and laws and regulations for impediments to opioid availability. Only four governments did not identify impediments; the remaining 32 identified an average of five impediments from a list of 13. The most frequently identified impediment was concern about addiction. Most of the identified impediments were related to concerns about addiction, diversion, restrictive drug laws, insufficient importation of opioids, and inadequacies in healthcare systems.

Over half (54%) of the governments indicated that their countries experienced periodic unavailability of opioids due to insufficient importation, delays in distribution, unanticipated increases in demand, administrative delays, or insufficient manufacture. It was also evident that some governments have difficulty estimating the amounts of opioids needed each year; 60% reported having had to request permission from INCB to amend their annual authorization to allow for increases in morphine, fentanyl, and pethidine (meperidine).

National governments also identified numerous legal restrictions on opioids. Many governments indicated that their laws carried tough penalties for violation of prescribing requirements and had provisions that (a) required the reporting to the government of patients who were prescribed opioid analgesics, (b) restricted the maximum doses of opioids, and (c) limited the amount of opioids that physicians could prescribe for patients.

Less than half (48%) of the governments reported that their national narcotics law recognizes that opioids are indispensable for the relief of pain and suffering, although this is a fundamental principle of the Single Convention. Only 63% had a law recognizing the government's duty to ensure availability of opioids for medical purposes.

Over half of the responding governments (65%) indicated they had national policies to improve the medical use of opioids. These policies focused principally on cancer and acute pain, with some attention to chronic pain, AIDS pain, and pediatric pain.

Conclusions

After reviewing the data, the board concluded that the medical need for opioids is far from being satisfied. Although a small but significant number of governments is making efforts to address impediments and to improve the availability of opioids for medical uses, many problems remain that should be addressed. With regard to regulatory restrictions on opioids, INCB said that such controls should not be so strict that they eliminate, for all practical purposes, the availability of opioids for medical uses.

Recommendations

INCB's recommendations are a blueprint for actions by national governments, the World Health Organization (WHO), health professionals, and nongovernmental organizations. Recognizing the need for further action of its own, INCB said it would continue to examine the situation and would examine the adequacy of the national governments' annual estimates of opioids. In the year 2000, INCB will reevaluate progress toward improving opioid availability and issue new findings and recommendations.

Significance of the INCB report

Implementation of the WHO's three-step analgesic method for cancer pain relief is often impeded by drug regulatory and health system impediments at the national level (WHO, 1990). WHO recommends a three-part national strategy of policy, education, and drug availability to correct this situation (WHO, 1996). The new report from INCB complements recommendations from international health authorities by urging government narcotics regulators to collaborate with health professionals to identify and address impediments to opioid availability and to ensure that each government's annual estimate adequately covers the country's medical needs for opioids.

The INCB report offers a strong rationale for national IASP chapters, national palliative care associations, and cancer care institutions to develop working relationships with their national narcotics regulators to improve opioid availability for the patient.

APS has responded to this challenge. The APS Board of Directors has asked the Analgesic Regulatory Affairs Committee to prepare a plan of action for implementing the INCB recommendations in the United States.

Availability of the INCB report

The INCB report, Availability of Opiates for Medical Needs (1995) is available from the International Narcotics Control Board, Vienna International Centre, Room E-1313, PO Box 500, A-1400 Vienna, Austria, as U.N. Publication No. E.96.XI.6. It is also available on the World Wide Web at http://www.undcp.org:80incb_hp.html.

The WHO Collaborating Center for Policy and Communications has also published a special issue of Cancer Pain Relief about the INCB report for world wide distribution, in English, French and Spanish (Joranson & Colleau, 1996).

Single copies and subscription information are available from the WHO Collaborating Center, Pain & Policy Studies Group, 1900 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53705.

References

Angarola, R.T., & Joranson, D.E. (1995). International efforts under way to provide adequate medication for pain control. APS Bulletin, 5(6), 9-10, 23.

International Narcotics Control Board. (1995). Availability of opiates for medical needs. Vienna: Author.

Joranson, D.E., & Colleau, S.M. (1996, Summer). Highlights of the INCB report. Cancer Pain Relief, 1-3.

United Nations. (1977a). Single convention on narcotic drugs, 1961. New York: Author.

United Nations. (1997b). Convention on psychotropic substances, 1971. New York: Author.

World Health Organization. (1990). Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

World Health Organization. (1996). Cancer pain relief With a guide to opioid availability (2nd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.